In the name of Inclusiveness

The Himalayan Times

28 December 2011

It seems that the word ”inclusiveness” is being interpreted in their own way by the political leaders in the name of reciprocal representation of the multi-ethnic groups of Nepal. Why are they trying to create confusions among the common people by disturbing the traditional co-existence of multi cultural and multi-ethnic groups for their petty political interests? Why we have been so sensitive and suspicious these days when we hear and talk about “inclusiveness” which was already there in Nepal for so many ages? All the ethnic groups with multi religion culture were living together without any grievances and disturbances. Have we been made to listen to the political leaders and believe in whatever they say?   

The government has, not surprisingly, decided to include 3000 Madhesis in the Nepal Army (NA) at such time when Nepal is politically passing through a very precarious situation. Should not the so called major political parties have to collectively work to address and include these issues in the new constitution rather than trying to patch up their weaknesses on piecemeal basis? What would the government do when the other groups also come forward with such proposals? Will the government be able to accommodate such proposals from other groups who claim to be equally eligible to join NA in mass in the name of “inclusiveness”?

It seems to me that the major political parties would not mind doing anything to remain in power which is very unfortunate for new Nepal. By doing so, they are inviting more political instability in the days ahead. Divide and rule policy does not always work. However, if they are thinking to be in the power by practicing this tactic, then it would be very unfortunate for both Nepal and its people. Let us hope that the responsible political parties would use their common sense and act accordingly for the long lasting peace and prosperity of Nepal.

Rai Biren Bangdel

Maharajgunj, Kathmandu